About

Textiles deserve the same autonomy as semiconductors

Fabric is one of the largest manufacturing sectors on earth and one of the least instrumented. We think that is the opportunity, not an accident.

  • Early stage
  • Remote team
  • Physical AI

Leadership

Who is building Yarneon

Yarneon is led by its co-founders, Ethan Mitchell (CEO) and Ryan Parker (CTO).

Ethan Mitchell

Ethan owns the mill relationships, the pilot programme and the commercial model, starting with the dyehouses and weaving sheds where shade misses and re-dyes cost the most.

Co-Founder & CEO

Ryan Parker

Ryan owns the platform: mill-edge perception and control, the OT connectors, model serving on the NVIDIA stack, and the audit architecture behind every Yarneon agent.

Co-Founder & CTO

Why now

Three things changed at once

01

Sensing got cheap

Line-scan cameras, NIR and inline spectrophotometry are now affordable at mill scale rather than lab scale.

02

Edge compute got real

A ruggedised GPU appliance can run segmentation at loom and stenter speed inside a dusty weaving shed.

03

The craft is retiring

The colourists and weaving masters who hold the tacit knowledge are leaving faster than mills can replace them.

The problem

Textiles clothe the world and still run on craft, spreadsheets and hope

Fabric is made at enormous scale and inspected at human speed. That gap is where the industry’s waste lives.

Making fabric means spinning fibre to a consistent count and twist, weaving or knitting to exact construction, dyeing and finishing to exact shade, fastness and hand, and inspecting for slubs, holes, streaks, stains, barré, skew and width faults, all to buyer spec, fully traceable.

It is unforgiving. A yarn drift, a loom fault, a dye-recipe error or a finishing defect turns into seconds, reprocessing, shade rejects and buyer chargebacks. Dyeing and finishing are craft-bound and enormously water- and energy-hungry. And the whole mill is paced by a colourist and operator workforce that is shrinking faster than it is being replaced.

Most mill managers run blind on real-time yarn quality, fabric defects, shade, chemistry, waste and roll genealogy. The work is high-volume, tolerance-bound, resource-intensive and rate-constrained, which is the exact profile autonomy is for.

Seconds

Found after the roll is made

Slubs, holes, streaks and shade misses are caught at the inspection table, not while the fabric is being made.

Re-dyes

Shade missed at drain

A standing recipe card against many greige suppliers and seasonal water. The miss is paid in water, steam and time.

Water and energy

Per kilogram, unmeasured

Most mills know the monthly bill and not the litres per kilogram per shade family.

Audits

Genealogy by hand

A roll’s history reconstructed from spreadsheets and paper lab dips every time a buyer asks.

And the constraint underneath

The craft is retiring

A senior colourist can look at a bath and know it is running hot. There are fewer of them every year, and no mill has found a way to hire the difference.

What we believe

Four opinions we build on

Belief

Autonomy must be bounded

A system that cannot be refused, reverted and audited will never be trusted with a machine, and should not be.

Belief

Evidence beats assurance

Buyers do not want a promise about your process. They want the record of what you produced.

Belief

Craft is data

Every colourist override is a labelled example. Capture it and the mill compounds instead of decaying.

Belief

Physics before language

A fabric line is a control problem. Language models help humans read it; they do not run it.

Belief

Deploy where the machine is

Autonomy that depends on a stable internet link is not autonomy in a mill.

Belief

Say the aspirational parts out loud

Anything not yet in production is labelled as such, on this site and in every deck.

Trust signals

What the runs actually produce

No customer results are published yet. These are platform facts and plan terms from our own documents. Outcomes will be measured against each mill’s own trailing twelve months, in shadow mode before anything is controlled.

9

Mill agents, one per stage, from spinning to release.

6

Products in the loop: Vireon, Spindra, Loomix, Shadeon, Doffex and Twinly.

3 to 5

Design partners we are onboarding first, one wedge workflow each.

$14k

Per line per month on the Line plan. Mill and Enterprise sit above it.

Items marked ASPIRATIONAL are design targets ahead of production validation.

Agent graph

One run, ten steps, one human decision

This is the shape of a dye lot on Yarneon, shown as an illustrative scenario rather than a customer run. Ingest and simulation fan out, converge on a colourist approval gate, then dosing, verification, finishing, inspection and release. The accent traces the active path; every node opens in the inspector.

RUN-4471 10 steps · 1 approval gate · 1 recovered failure · illustrative scenario COMPLETE
ingest conformance twin simulate recipe dye + colour approve human gate dose bath control shade verify ΔE finish stenter inspect vision rework replan grade release

Scroll the graph sideways · or open the text equivalent below

SUCCEEDED APPROVAL FAILED RUNNING
Text equivalent, workflow steps, dependencies and status
Run RUN-4471 workflow graph, as a table
StepStageDepends on StatusDuration
ingestconformancenone SUCCEEDED0.8s
twinsimulateingest SUCCEEDED46s
recipedye + colouringest SUCCEEDED2.4s
approvehuman gatetwin, recipe APPROVAL4m 12s
dosebath controlapprove SUCCEEDED118m
shadeverify ΔEdose SUCCEEDED9.1s
finishstenterdose SUCCEEDED64m
inspectvisionshade, finish FAILED38m
reworkreplaninspect SUCCEEDED1.6s
gradereleaserework SUCCEEDED3.0s
  • Parallel branches2twin simulation and recipe prediction run together
  • Human gates1colourist approval, 15 minutes, attributed
  • Failures recovered1weft streak on roll 09, replanned in-run

Run timeline

RUN-4471 · Indigo poplin, 3,180 kg, due Thursday

The same scenario run as an ordered timeline: step, status, duration and the tool result behind it. Inspection failed on one roll, the run recovered, replanned the cut and still held the ship date.

RUN-4471 RUN COMPLETE Scenario mill · reactive exhaust jet dyeing · illustrative run, not a customer deployment

Goal: Dye lot DL-4471 · 3,180 kg · 40s combed cotton poplin · shade Indigo 19-4028 TCX · ΔE ≤ 0.8 · due Thu 06:00

  1. 01 ingest.lot_state SUCCEEDED 0.8s

    Pulls greige genealogy for 14 rolls: yarn lots, loom, greige GSM 138, absorbency and residual size from the prep line.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Quality-and-Conformance
    result  ← 14 rolls · 3,180 kg · mean GSM 138.2 (σ 1.1) · prep OK
  2. 02 twin.simulate_lot SUCCEEDED 46s

    Omniverse fabric-line twin simulates the exhaust curve, machine loading and takt for three candidate recipes before a drop of dye is used.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Yield-and-Takt
    result  ← 3 candidates scored · best predicted ΔE 0.52 · 118 min cycle
  3. 03 dye.predict_recipe SUCCEEDED 2.4s

    Spectral recipe model proposes a 3-dye combination against the buyer standard, corrected for this substrate’s absorbency and the current water hardness.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Dye-and-Color
    result  ← 2.14% Navy RGB · 0.61% Blue BRF · 0.08% Black B · salt 62 g/L
  4. 04 human.approve_recipe APPROVAL 4m 12s

    Recipe deviates >5% from the standing card, so autonomy is capped: the colourist approves, rejects or edits before any dosing. Guardrail policy MILL-02/DYE-APPROVAL.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Dye-and-Color
    result  → awaiting colourist · approved on shift 04:18
  5. 05 dye.control_bath SUCCEEDED 118m

    Closed-loop dosing and ramp control against live bath spectrophotometry; two mid-cycle corrections applied when exhaustion ran 4% ahead of model.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Dye-and-Color
    result  ← exhaust 96.4% · 2 corrections · bath ΔE 0.41 at drain
  6. 06 shade.verify_lot SUCCEEDED 9.1s

    Per-roll spectral read against Indigo 19-4028 TCX under D65/TL84/A; metamerism scored and rolls sorted into shade bands.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Shade-and-Quality
    result  ← mean ΔE 0.58 · 13 rolls band A · 1 roll band B
  7. 07 finish.control_stenter SUCCEEDED 64m

    Stenter chemistry, overfeed and curing profile set to hold hand, 148 cm width and residual shrinkage under 3%.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Finish-and-Hand
    result  ← width 148.3 cm · shrink 2.1% warp / 1.4% weft
  8. 08 inspect.scan_rolls FAILED 38m

    In-line vision flags a recurring 6 cm weft streak on roll 09 between 412 m and 445 m, traced to a stenter pin-chain slip, not a dye fault.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Defect-and-Inspect
    result  ← 1 defect cluster · roll 09 · 33 m affected · class WEFT_STREAK
  9. 09 plan.rework_route SUCCEEDED 1.6s

    cuOpt re-plans the cut and rework route: 33 m diverted to seconds, remaining 14,890 m re-sequenced so the buyer’s Thursday ship date still holds.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Yield-and-Takt
    result  ← 33 m to seconds (0.22%) · ship date held
  10. 10 quality.grade_and_release SUCCEEDED 3.0s

    Four-point grading, roll genealogy and the conformance packet (AATCC 61, ISO 105-C06, ZDHC MRSL declaration) are assembled and released to the buyer portal.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Quality-and-Conformance
    result  ← 13 rolls Grade A · 1 roll Grade B · packet signed
RUN OUTCOME

Lot released first time, on shade, on date.

Result of run RUN-4471
MeasureValueContext
Final mean ΔE0.58against a 0.80 tolerance
Re-dyes avoided1the standing card would have missed shade
Seconds0.22%versus the scenario mill baseline of 1.9%
Water used46 L/kgversus 59 L/kg on the scenario recipe card
Human decisions1the recipe approval gate

Why this matters

A mill does not fail on the good lots. It fails on the lot where the substrate drifted, the recipe card was wrong, and nobody found out until the buyer opened the carton. Yarneon makes that lot legible while it is still in the machine.

Design-partner programme

What a design partnership involves

Three to five mills, one wedge workflow each, shadow mode first. The sequence comes from our MVP plan and does not change for anyone.

  1. Phase 1

    Instrument

    The wedge workflow is connected in shadow mode and the baseline for seconds, re-dyes and waste is measured from the mill’s own data.

  2. Phase 2

    Assist

    The agent recommends yarn, construction and recipe moves and predicts defects and shade. An engineer approves each one, and accuracy is scored in the open.

  3. Phase 3

    Graduate

    Low-risk inspection, dye and finishing loops move to bounded auto-control one setpoint at a time. Exceptions escalate to a named person.

  4. Phase 4

    Expand

    Adjacent modules are added within the same mill once the wedge holds its numbers. Publication of results is the mill’s decision.

Accelerated computing

Physical AI needs real compute, at the machine

Line-speed vision, spectral colour science and a fabric-line twin are GPU-essential workloads. Yarneon runs them at the mill edge and trains them centrally.

The accelerated-computing stack behind the mill loop
ComponentRole in the mill
Isaac + JetsonRobotic roll, beam and doffing handling, plus mill-edge inference on inspection and control cells.
Metropolis / DeepStream + TensorRTLine-speed fabric-defect vision pipelines targeting sub-100 ms per-frame decisions. ASPIRATIONAL
HoloscanSensor fusion across cameras, spectrophotometers, probes, PLC events and meters into one explainable state stream.
Omniverse + Replicator / CosmosThe as-produced fabric twin, and synthetic generation of rare defect, barré and shade-variation cases.
cuOptDye-lot sequencing, rework queues, machine assignment and water/energy allocation under hard constraints.
Triton + NIM + NeMoMulti-model serving at the mill edge, plus grounded textile-process and colour reasoning with citations.
NVIDIA AI EnterprisePrivate and on-prem deployment for groups protecting dye recipes and construction IP.

Items marked ASPIRATIONAL describe target architecture ahead of full production validation.

The market

Why this is a large business

Market sizing for autonomous textile operations
MeasureValueBasis
TAM$17BGlobal software, automation and quality spend addressable by mill autonomy.
SAM$4.2BMills of sufficient scale and instrumentation to deploy within five years.
SOM$250MRealistic capture in target geographies over the plan horizon.
Typical ACV$650k–$8.5MEnterprise group contracts across multiple sites.

Deployment

From first connector to bounded control, one phase at a time

No mill hands over a jet on day one. The path is deliberately slow at the start and faster once the numbers hold. Durations are quoted after the assessment, because they depend on how instrumented the mill already is.

  1. Phase 1

    Connect

    Mill survey, edge appliance install, connectors to machines, MES and meters. Telemetry starts flowing; nothing is controlled.

  2. Phase 2

    Observe

    Models run in shadow against live production. Predictions are scored against what the mill actually produced, on your data.

  3. Phase 3

    Assist

    The agent proposes; a human commits. Approval gates, setpoint envelopes and revert paths are agreed with the process owners.

  4. Phase 4

    Control

    Bounded auto-control on the setpoints you authorise, one at a time, with autonomy ceilings that you can lower at any moment.

Partners

We do not do this alone

Machine builders

Loom, knitting, jet and stenter OEMs embedding Yarneon control alongside their own HMIs.

Co-engineering, certified connectors, joint field support.

Systems integrators

Automation integrators deploying mill-edge appliances, cameras and robotics on the floor.

Deployment certification, margin on hardware and services.

Colour & lab vendors

Spectrophotometer and colour-library vendors whose data makes recipe prediction sharper.

Bidirectional colour sync, joint lab-dip workflows.

Compute & silicon

NVIDIA Inception and accelerated-computing partners for edge, training and simulation.

Reference architectures, early hardware access.

Sustainability programmes

ZDHC, Higg and OEKO-TEX aligned programmes consuming Yarneon utility and chemistry data.

Automated evidence, verified reporting.

Buyers & brands

Apparel and home brands who want the conformance record their mills cannot produce today.

Supplier scorecards, shade-family intelligence.

Come build the mill layer

We are hiring controls engineers, vision researchers and people who have actually run a dyehouse.

Book a mill assessment